The Physical Economy

08/06/2026

A wise man recently advised me over lunch that seeking to identify and predict all the challenges and risks the world faces was akin to boiling an ocean. Instead, the trick is to invert the problem and construct a defensive portfolio.

Equity markets are, at the time of writing, priced for a world in which none of the risks that seem possible or probable occur. Valuations are elevated, index leadership is historically narrow, and the concentration of returns in technology and AI-related names has created a structure in which a small number of assets are doing an outsized proportion of the work. Institutional investors are beginning, carefully and without fanfare, to reduce their overweight positions.

The desired result in portfolio terms is straightforward: to be positioned for the world that the risks suggest is coming rather than the world that current valuations assume. Naming those risks is the necessary first step. The Global Risk Matrix below provides the context. In almost every scenario it identifies, the recovery trade runs through physical assets – energy, industrial and critical metals, agricultural commodities, and gold. The question is not whether to hold commodity exposure – it is how.

For a full treatment of both the structural thesis and the construction framework, please see the other articles: Conviction through Volatility and From Conviction to Construction.

Global Risk Matrix

The Mispricing

The current equity rally and the structural commodity thesis exist in logical tension with each other – currently unresolved in market pricing. Three specific frictions make this visible.

The infrastructure tension is the most immediate, with the equity rally predicated on continued AI buildout. That buildout requires copper, energy, and critical minerals at a scale that current supply cannot meet. The market is simultaneously pricing AI growth as certain and commodity supply adequacy as assumed. The risk in that assumption is visible in the data: declining ore grades, insufficient project pipelines, and chronic grid underinvestment.

The policy tension compounds this. The same geopolitical conditions suppressing commodity pricing – Strait of Hormuz disruption, sanctions architecture, and supply chain fragmentation – are the conditions that make the equity growth assumption most fragile. The market is discounting physical disruption in commodity markets while ignoring its implications for the technology infrastructure that depends on stable physical supply chains. These are not separable risks.

The capital allocation tension is perhaps the most telling. Real money managers - historically the dominant flow in commodity markets over expiry and roll windows - have been withdrawing from the asset class, washed out by short-cycle volatility. The investors best positioned to hold through the noise have been replaced by faster, more discretionary participants. Meanwhile equity concentration has never been narrower. The same capital that has left commodity markets is sitting in a handful of names driving the index. That is not a diversified portfolio. It is a concentrated bet on a single outcome – and the conditions most likely to correct that bet are the same conditions that would validate the commodity thesis.

The supply and demand dynamics underlying both energy and industrial metals are developed in full in Conviction through Volatility. The short version: the IEA has quietly reintroduced a demand scenario showing no peak before 2050, US tight oil faces genuine maturation questions, copper's lead times from discovery to production routinely exceed fifteen years, and ore grades at existing mines have been declining for decades. The structural case does not depend on predicting a specific catalyst. It depends only on the arithmetic of supply and the direction of electrification.

For the full supply and demand analysis, please see Conviction to Commodities Despite Their Volatility.

Sample investment sleeves

The following three sleeves illustrate how the framework translates into portfolio form across different risk profiles and thematic emphases. They are starting points for discussion rather than prescriptive recommendations.

For the full construction framework including rotation strategies, relative value pairs, and the pre-commitment approach, please see From Conviction to Construction.

Resilience

Designed for investors seeking broad exposure to the long-cycle thesis with the lowest short-cycle volatility profile. Deliberately diversified across asset classes, with gold and sovereign bonds providing structural ballast alongside a defensive equity selection.

Asset Class	Allocation Band	Expression
Equity	20-30%	Defensive sectors - utilities, consumer staples, pharmaceuticals, defence, selective energy and mining
Bond	20-30%	Diversified sovereign exposure across multiple currencies and maturities
Gold	20-30%	Physical gold via ETCs
Cash	20-30%	Multi-currency deposit allocation

Energy Transition

Concentrated exposure across the full energy complex - LNG, oil, and nuclear - with lithium as a transitional materials component. LEAP options on key names provide capital-efficient long exposure while a volatility overlay manages downside risk.

Asset Class	Allocation Band	Expression
Equity	60-65%	LNG, oil, nuclear, and lithium producers - direct holdings and LEAP overlays
Volatility Overlay	15-20%	Cost averaging put positions across core equity names
Relative Value	8-10%	Directional crude oil futures exposure
Cash	8-10%	Liquidity reserve

Transition Metals

Concentrated exposure to the copper and aluminium supply constraint thesis at the intersection of electrification demand and structural underinvestment. The larger volatility overlay reflects the higher short-cycle volatility characteristic of base metals markets.

Asset Class	Allocation Band	Expression
Equity	55-60%	Copper and aluminium majors, silver producers - direct holdings and LEAP overlays
Volatility Overlay	25-30%	Cost averaging put positions across core copper and aluminium names
Relative Value	4-6%	Aluminium futures calendar spread
Cash	8-12%	Liquidity reserve

Important Disclaimer

This article is intended for general information purposes only and reflects the market environment at the time of writing. It does not constitute investment advice, a personal recommendation, or an offer to engage in any trading activity. The content does not take into account individual objectives or circumstances and should not be relied upon as the basis for any investment decision. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. 

Content may have been created by persons who have, have previously had, or may in the future have personal interests in securities or other financial products referred to therein. All conflicts and potential conflicts relating to our business are managed in accordance with our conflicts of interest policy. For more information, please refer to our Summary of Conflicts of Interest Policy. 

For more information and important risk disclosures, please see our Derivative Product Trading Notes and Privacy Policy. AMT Futures Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.